No Response to DC Cardioversion

Report:

Probable atrial flutter or fibrillation

Non-sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia 160/min

Inferior infarction ?age

Comment:

The patient was one of those surgical disasters that attract multiple medical consultations in the hope of explaining why things went wrong. Interestingly enough, one of the consultants was a Cardiologist called in by the surgeon while I was away. He and the duty Intensivist shocked the patient three times before declaring him resistant to countershocks!

One can see at once why electricity did not work: the patient was cardioverting himself all the time, only to relapse after a few seconds. He had been at it for days (below, Fig 225a), on top of the original sinus rhythm, long before he had to come to ICU.

The QR complexes in the inferior leads are due to a known (remote) inferior infarction. Their morphology is diagnostic of infarction even in VEBs and VT146. The supraventricular beats show no reciprocal changes, but the ventricular ectopic ones do. The infarction looks acute or recent on these ECG, perhaps exaggerated by the tachycardia.

The patient was put on amiodarone infusion and the VT subsided into bigeminy (in probable flutter) and then isolated VEBs in sinus rhythm with SVEBs (below, Fig 225b).

If you have any suggestions for or feedback on this report, please let us know.